November 17, 2009

AT&T vs. Verizon (FIGHT!)

Remember when you’re a kid, and you were involved in some sort of innocent group activity, then some kid gets aggravated for something minor and wails off and punches another kid in the face?

Did you immediately pounce into action, separate them, and shout, “ALL RIGHT! BREAK IT UP! LET’S ALL JUST THINK CLEARLY HERE!”

Of course not. You did what all the other kids did. You started chanting, “Fight! Fight! Fight!” and you enjoyed the next twenty seconds more than you would your entire birthday.

It’s a terrible flaw in the human psyche: we love fights.

Why do you think millions of people gather around televisions across the world to watch every single UFC event? Grown men, some of them fairly sensible (fairly, or “barely?”), pummel each other in the face, twist arms and legs into unnatural angles, scream into television cameras, then throw on t-shirts within seconds of winning a fight that have roughly seven dozen logos plastered across them.

The Romans had their gladiators. We have our UFC. The Middle Ages had their jousting. We have our Muhammad Ali and Mike Tyson. Victorian aristocrats had their duels. We have our Dancing With the Stars.

Yes…that last one was out of place.

But you get the idea. This is why I am absolutely filled with glee about AT&T and Verizon getting into a little spat with each other over Verizon’s feisty (but accurate) commercials that show just how widespread its 3G coverage is when compared to AT&T’s.

As a brilliant centerpiece of the commercial, Verizon pokes fun at AT&T/Apple with “There’s a map for that,” wittily playing off the annoying popular “There’s an app for that” commercials.

But now AT&T is suing Verizon. Why? Because’ they claim that the advertisements are intentionally misleading about AT&T’s network, implying that the white areas on the map don’t get coverage.

What this proves is what I’ve been claiming about AT&T for years: either they’re sleazeballs who are trying to kill an effective ad by manipulating the legal system or THEY THINK WE’RE IDIOTS.

The map is accurate. Period.

What Verizon is proving is that they have a far superior 3G coverage area. AT&T isn’t even trying to dispute that point. AT&T lagged behind in preparing their network, so now they’re being slaughtered by Verizon in regards to widespread coverage quality.

(quick note) – If you want to know the different between 3G and regular cell coverage (regular coverage being what AT&T is apparently so proud of), all you have to know is that 3G is like broadband Internet while AT&T’s EDGE network is like dial-up. Translation: EDGE is like a reminder of the days when you signed onto AOL, but were first greeted by a long and painful “WEEEEEEEEKKKKRRRRRRRCCCCCKKKKKKKEEEEEEBBBBRRRKKKK” sound before you logged on and waited ten minutes for a simple web page to load.

I’m in one of AT&T’s 3G-available regions of the country, but I still get horrible coverage. I can’t even carry on a conversation with confidence that it won’t get disconnected while at my house (again, inside AT&T’s 3G region). I’ve not only thought about switching to Verizon one day, but doing so even if it meant leaving my iPhone behind.

So AT&T, keep your lawsuits going. You’re looking like an even bigger jerk than people thought you were.

IMPROVE YOUR NETWORK!

UPDATE: Verizon’s response to AT&T’s lawsuit?

“AT&T did not file this lawsuit because Verizon’s “There’s A Map For That” advertisements are untrue; AT&T sued because Verizon’s ads are true and the truth hurts.”

PER-KOW!!!

November 9, 2009

Yo Joe!

Joseph Lieberman stands yet again as a voice of reason crying out in the wilderness. In regards to the recent Fort Hood shootings committed by Major Nidal Malik Hasan, this article (from breitbart.com) says Senator Lieberman…

…said Sunday he wants Congress to determine whether the shootings constitute a terrorist attack and whether warning signs that Hasan was embracing an increasingly extremist view of Islamic ideology were missed.

Classmates who participated in a 2007-2008 master’s program at a military college told The Associated Press that they complained to faculty during the program about what they considered to be Hasan’s anti-American views, which included his giving a presentation that justified suicide bombing and telling classmates that Islamic law trumped the U.S. Constitution.

Yes, Hasan, as recently as 2008, gave a presentation that justified jihadist suicide bombings. The whole Islamic law trumping the Constitution thing could be argued as reasonable from a personal level, depending upon what one’s interpretation of “Islamic law” is, but suicide bombings in the name of Allah?

Why was this man still in the Army? Was the military worried about a potential backlash from the Muslim community if they brought up that a major was espousing violence in the name of Islam?

Again, from Sen. Lieberman:

“If Hasan was showing signs, saying to people that he had become an Islamist extremist, the U.S. Army has to have zero tolerance,” Lieberman, an independent from Connecticut, said on “Fox News Sunday.” “He should have been gone.”

Thanks for speaking up, Joe. However…

Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey said Sunday it’s important for the country not to get caught up in speculation about Hasan’s Muslim faith, and he has instructed his commanders to be on the lookout for anti-Muslim reaction to the killings at the Texas post.

If anyone is beating up Muslims in the streets because of this, then they deserve to be arrested. However, we’re not supposed to get caught up in speculation about Hasan’s faith, despite the fact that he cried “Allahu Akbar!” (God is great) every time he shot a victim in cold blood at Fort Hood? Hasan apparently targeted people in uniform during his attack, seeing his act of violence as retaliation for American involvements in the Middle East.

It is now coming out that U.S. intelligence agencies were aware that Hasan was attempting to contact al Qaeda using “electronic means.” When? Roughly a month before the attack.

According to the officials, the Army was informed of Hasan’s contact, but unclear what, if anything, the Army did in response.

Why not yank the guy out of the military? Put him in the brig. Grill him. Waterboard him (kidding, kidding)…

JUST DO SOMETHING!

Because of bureaucracy’s failings at acting on intel suggesting Hasan, we’ve lost (to date) twelve servicemen and women and one innocent civilian.

November 6, 2009

Fort Hood

The wife and I were traveling at the time of the Fort Hood shooting, and didn’t have a clue about it until we laid down at the hotel and turned on the TV. We tried to play catch-up for twenty minutes, but still didn’t have any information. It was as if the news channels were purposely omitting the alleged shooter’s name for long periods of time.

Finally, I got online and started reading about the day’s events and the soldier’s history. I also read about President Obama’s request for people to not “jump to conclusions.” What exactly does that mean?

What it means is that Major Nidal Malik Hasan was a disgruntled Muslim, but we shouldn’t take that into consideration. What it means is that Hasan made disturbing comments about the United States’ involvement in the Middle East to students, but we shouldn’t take that into consideration. What it means is that Hasan shouted “Allahu Akbar!” according to several witnesses, before he opened fire on his comrades, but we must not take that into consideration.

When a pastor came out in front of his congregation and said that he prayed for Obama’s death, I condemned his actions. When a Christian killed a doctor who performed abortions, I condemned his actions. When a “family values” Christian Republican politician is listed as having cheated on his wife with prostitutes, I condemned his actions.

When a Christian does something inherently un-Christian, I have no problem telling people, “He/she doesn’t reflect Christianity.”

Christianity is not, doctrinally, a violent religion. If you read Jesus’ teachings, He was stunningly anti-violence. He taught peace with other me. He taught us to turn the other cheek. He taught to love your enemies.

Does the teachings of Islam teach a love for your enemies?

You decide. Here are a few verses from the Qur’an:

9:5-6 – Kill those who join other gods with God wherever you may find them.

4:89 – They desire that you should disbelieve as they have disbelieved, so that you might be (all) alike; therefore take not from among them friends until they fly (their homes) in Allah’s way; but if they turn back, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them, and take not from among them a friend or a helper.

8:39-42 – Say to the Infidels: if they desist from their unbelief, what is now past shall be forgiven; but if they return to it, they have already before them the doom of the ancients! Fight then against them till strife be at an end, and the religion be all of it God’s.

2:191-193 – “And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Muslims] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers]…and fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah.”

5:33 – “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”

8:12 – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”

9:123 – “O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness.”

48.29 – “Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves”

From the Hadith:

Bukhari (52:177) – Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”

Abu Dawud (14:2526) – The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah” and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist)

Muslim (1:33) – the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah

Muslim (20:4645) – “…He (the Messenger of Allah) did that and said: There is another act which elevates the position of a man in Paradise to a grade one hundred (higher), and the elevation between one grade and the other is equal to the height of the heaven from the earth. He (Abu Sa’id) said: What is that act? He replied: Jihad in the way of Allah! Jihad in the way of Allah!”

Muslim (20:4696) – “the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: ‘One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihid died the death of a hypocrite.’”

Tabari 9:69 “Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us” The words of Muhammad, prophet of Islam.

Ibn Ishaq: 992 – “Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah.” Muhammad’s instructions to his men prior to a military raid.

From The Religion of Peace (a web-site dedicated to the nature and origins of Islamic violence:

Other than the fact that Muslims haven’t killed every non-Muslim under their domain, there is very little else that they can point to as proof that theirs is a peaceful, tolerant religion. Few verses in the Qur’an can be construed to fit the contemporary virtues of religious tolerance and universal brotherhood, and those that do are earlier “Meccan” verses that are obviously abrogated by later ones. Small wonder that Muslim apologists spend a lot of time speaking of the “risks” of trying to interpret the Qur’an without their “assistance.”

Far from being mere history or theological construct, the violent verses of the Qur’an have played a key role in the many massacres in Muslim history, including the brutal slaughter of tens of millions of Hindus for five centuries beginning around 1000 AD with Mahmud of Ghazni’s bloody conquest, including the massacre of those who defending their temples from destruction. Buddhism was very nearly wiped off the Indian subcontinent. Judaism and Christianity met the same fate (albeit more slowly) in areas conquered by Muslim armies, including the Middle East, North Africa and parts of Europe, including today’s Turkey. Zoroastrianism, the ancient religion of a proud Persian people is despised by Muslims and barely survives in modern Iran.

So ingrained is violence in the religion that Islam has never really stopped being at war, either with other religions or with itself.

Muhammad was a military leader, laying siege to towns, massacring the men, raping their women, enslaving their children, and taking what was once the property of others for his own. On several occasions he rejected offers of surrender from the besieged inhabitants and killed those whom he could take prisoner. He inspired his followers to battle even when they did not feel it was right to fight, threatening them with Hell if they did not, promising them slaves and booty if they did. Muhammad allowed his men to rape traumatized women captured in battle.

It is important to emphasize that Muslim armies waged aggressive campaigns, and it was the companions of Muhammad who made the most dramatic military gains in the decades following his death. The principle set in motion early on was that the civilian population of a town was to be destroyed (ie. men executed, women and children taken as slaves) if they defended themselves. Although modern Muslim apologists often claim that Islam only attacked in self-defense, this is not only an oxymoron, but it is flatly contradicted by the accounts of Muslim historians and others going back to the time of Muhammad.

If I heard a massive outcry from the Muslim community every time something like this happened in the name of Islam, I would feel much better, but that’s not what I’m hearing. From the American Muslim community, I hear nothing but silence. From the Middle Eastern community, these actions are met with applause in the streets. What is the real Islam?

Hasan might not have been part of a terrorist organization, but he WAS, by definition, a terrorist.

September 19, 2009

The Lord’s Prayer – 2 Years Old

How many of you can quote the Lord’s prayer?

How many can sing it?

How many are willing to sing it in front of a camera?

September 15, 2009

Kanye West: Internet Meme

Kanye West himself is responsible for a new Internet meme.

Highly criticized for his interruption of Taylor Swift’s acceptance speech at the VMA awards (even President Obama got involved), Kanye’s bizarre behavior has created new fodder for the web’s useless content creators. Useless…but hilarious.

The following video was up and running within about an hour of the incident:

Kanye Creation

Kanye West

Kanye Shaq

Kanye Martin Luther King

Kanye West

Thanks to the article at Comedy Central, linked to by Digg.com, for the material.

September 12, 2009

The Boys

I’ve been slaving away at edits for a while, but did get to go to Shannon & Charidy’s house to celebrate B.E. Stanley’s birthday. The boys were there, and as is their custom, providing us with some entertainment:

August 5, 2009

The Death of FOXNews.com

Rupert Murdoch

I like my news sites. CNN, BBC, ESPN.com, Kotaku…and of course, FOX News.

But FOX News is about to make a colossal mistake. Seen on MarketWatch.com’s article: News Corp. swings to loss on charges

Murdoch, speaking to analysts and reporters during a conference call, said that advertising markets are showing “good signs of life” despite ongoing weakness in the automotive and financial categories.

Murdoch also said the company intends to charge for all of its news Web sites.

“Quality journalism is not cheap, and an industry that gives away its content is simply cannibalizing its ability to produce good reporting,” Murdoch said.

Okay, let’s get one thing straight: established media giants have no idea what to do with the Internet.

The Internet has changed the modern consumer. Everything is free, and is expected to stay free. Things that aren’t free are ignored and destroyed. The way to make money on the Internet is to increase traffic. Increased traffic turns into advertising opportunities. Get even more traffic, and the advertising dollars go up.

Think about the most popular sites out there: Google, Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, Digg…ALL FREE!

Today’s generation doesn’t think that you need to pay for music. First they had Napster. Napster was killed by the RIAA and that whole crew. Did that stop people from stealing music? Of course not; in came Limewire, Pirate Bay, and Mininova.

They don’t just steal music. Now it’s movies, applications, TV shows, ebooks, and anything else that exists digitally.

And you think they’re going to pay for news? Why do these people think that the newspaper and magazine industries are dying rapidly? You have to pay for the paper. You have to pay for magazines. Additionally, why read yesterday’s news when you can read today’s news online 2 minutes after it happens?

Oh, yeah…and it’s free.

Or at least it was. What is going to happen to FOX News' online site is that it's going to push traffic to their competitors. As soon as that happens, their competitors are going to cash in on their increased traffic and increase their advertising revenues.

Stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid.

It’s amazing just how little such powerful, rich figures in the entertainment and news industries actually understand about this new digital age in which we’re engulfed. The future belongs to the young men and women who understand it because they live in it, not to the RIAA and news conglomerates who are expecting methods from the past to transfer seamlessly to the Internet.

For you FOXNews.com fans, if you need to know where to go for your news after they shut you out and die a speedy death, just visit the Drudge Report. They’ll link to free sites that aren’t run by morons.

(((And if you get there quickly enough, you’ll see where I got the link to this story.)))

July 31, 2009

Say it Ain’t So, Papi…Say it Ain’t So…

Big Papi

I became a Boston Red Sox fan during the late 90s. I wasn’t much of a baseball fan growing up; all I cared about was the NBA when I was young. I cheered for MJ up until about 1994, then started pulling for the Utah Jazz during the last two Bulls championship years. Baseball? Nowhere near my mind.

Then I started taking an interest in it for some odd reason, and one thing became absolutely clear: I hated the New York Yankees.

The Yankees won everything. They were clean-shaven and cocky. They had history. They had the biggest payroll in baseball. They had it all. And yes, they had the typical New York fan base: loud, obnoxious, arrogant, and generally disgusting.

Then there were the Red Sox. The Curse of the Bambino. Eighty-six eventual years without a title. Bad luck case after bad luck case. Bill Buckner. Rough guys with facial hair. Decades of underachieving. These guys were the David to the Yankee’s Goliath (even though they also had a huge payroll).

I saw a few games between the two teams, and I was sold. My family’s American League team was the Rangers, but I was a Red Sox fan. At first I liked them because they were the Yankees’ arch-rival, but then I loved them because they were the “SAWX.” Out in the NL, I was still a regional supporter of the Astros, but when it came to the AL, it was nothing but Sox.

Then it happened. The “Idiots” brought a title to Boston after 86 years. 2004 is a year that will forever bring a smile to every Red Sox fan’s face. They came back from 3-0 down in the playoffs to beat the Yankees in 7 games. It was the stuff from which legends are made.

Then today happened. Two of the biggest stars for the Sox in 2004, Manny Ramirez (already outed) and David Ortiz were revealed to having been using performance-enhancing drugs during that stretch.

2004 has now become 2004*.

Big Papi, a crucial piece of the puzzle in bringing Boston back to the top after most of a century of losing was a user. What made it worse is that he has spent years denying allegations that he was a user. “Me? Big Papi? Noooo…”

Actually…yes. Yes, Papi, you cheated. Hundreds of players in the Major Leagues were using as well, but you were part of the problem. And worst of all for every Boston fan out there, we BELIEVED that you were clean. When you told us you weren’t cheating like the rest, we believed you. We loved you. You were our big, home run-smacking teddy bear. BIG PAPI!

Today Big Papi seemed a little smaller. 2004* isn’t quite as endearing of a memory. And it all serves as a reminder that roughly the past 20 years of baseball will be a painful, dark time in the sport’s history.

July 22, 2009

Creativity

The Internet has brought a lot of bad into the world and caused billions of hours of lost productivity, but without it, we would miss the opportunity to experience some incredibly creative work from very talented people out there. Case in point: Keith Loutit.

About Keith (in his own words):

I am a Sydney based photographer. These photographs and short films were made in ordinary places, probably not too unlike where you live. Combining a variety of techniques, I aim to help people take a second look at places that are familiar to them.

That’s a modest way to describe his own work. What Keith does is take a Nikon camera, a tilt-shift lens, stop-motion photography, and his talents to create some of the most unique videos I’ve seen on the web. I’ll say no more, but just to clarify…THESE ARE REAL. Keith takes thousands of photos, stitches them together in a video-editing program, adds in some sweet music, and then proceeds to blow peoples’ minds.

Enjoy.

Bathtub IV from Keith Loutit on Vimeo.

Origin II from Keith Loutit on Vimeo.

The North Wind Blew South from Keith Loutit on Vimeo.

See all ten of Keith’s videos by CLICKING HERE.

July 16, 2009

“God Awful”

The CEO of the Black Chamber of Commerce RIPPED Barbara Boxer for injecting race into an argument simply to gain his favor.

I’ll be honest…I got tickled.